Robustness of perceptual features used for automatic aural classification to propagation effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous effort has shown that a prototype aural classifier developed at Defence R&D Canada can be used to reduce false alarm rates and successfully discriminate cetacean vocalizations from several species. The aural classifier achieves accurate results by using perceptual signal features that model the features employed by the human auditory system. Current work focuses on determining the robustness of the perceptual features to propagation effects for two of the cetacean species studied previously - bowhead and humpback whales. To this end, classification results are compared for the original vocalizations to classification results obtained after the vocalizations were re-transmitted underwater over ranges of 2 to 10 km. Additional insight into the propagation effects is gained from transmission of synthetic bowhead and humpback vocalizations, designed to have features similar to the most important aural features for classification of bowhead and humpback vocalizations. Each perceptual feature is examined individually to determine its robustness to propagation effects compared to the other aural features. To gain further understanding of propagation effects on the features, preliminary propagation modelling results are presented in addition to experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".