MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4245101745 · doi:10.31223/x59s38

Tectonic evolution of an Early Cryogenian late-magmatic basin in central Madagascar

2021· preprint· en· W4245101745 on OpenAlexaff
Raisa Costa, Renata da Silva Schmitt, Alan S. Collins, Sheree Armistead, Igor Vasconcelos Gomes, Donnelly B. Archibald, Theodore Razakamanana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier UniversityLaurentian UniversityGeological Survey of Canada
FundersUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroPetrobrasConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsGeologyZirconGeochemistryArcheanCratonDetritusProterozoicPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central and southern Madagascar comprise a number of distinctive Archaean crustal blocks (the Antongil-Masora and Antananarivo domains) overlain by Proterozoic supracrustal sequences, preserved in the East African Orogen. Here, we present U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopic data for two supracrustal units from detrital and metamorphic zircon grains. The lower sequence is comprised of quartzite and calc-silicate units with a major Palaeoproterozoic detrital zircon source and a minor Archaean contribution with a maximum depositional age of ca. 1780 Ma. This sequence reflects a stable shelf sedimentation within the Antananarivo Domain and is correlated with the Itremo Group. U–Pb and Hf data are equivocal in determining the direct sources for the Archaean and early Palaeoproterozoic detrital zircon grains. However, the abundant ca. 2.3-1.8 Ga detrital grains are correlative with the Congo-Tanzania-Bangweulu Block and as these are close to the inferred age of the Itremo Basin, these are interpreted to be single cycle detritus. This implies that the Congo-Tanzania-Bangweulu craton was close to central Madagascar at ca. 1.8-1.6 Ga and the lower sequence would correspond to an originally contiguous late Palaeoproterozoic to early Mesoproterozoic sedimentary basin across central Madagascar. The upper metasedimentary unit has contrasting detrital sources and is represented mostly by biotite-plagioclase paragneiss, with an inferred psammitic protolith interleaved with volcanic/subvolcanic andesitic/rhyolitic dikes. The predominant Tonian-aged population (ca. 860-710 Ma) are igneous zircon grains with εHf(t) values varying from -15.1 to -29.2 and TDM Hf model ages between ca. 3.4 and 2.6 Ga. These grains were derived from the ca. 850-750 Ma Imorona-Itsindro magmatic suite. Their Neoarchaean-Palaeoproterozoic cores are interpreted as xenocrysts, reinforcing that the Imorona-Itsindro magmatism has a prominent continental reworking component. The probable tectonic setting for this Early Cryogenian sedimentary basin would represent a transition from an intra-arc to an intracontinental setting related to an outboard subduction, partially jammed at ca. 710 Ma due to the subduction of a ridge-transform system. The analogue would be the western US, where the Basin and Range region corresponds to a wide rift associated with a major mantle thermal anomaly. The absence of geological units and structures between ca. 720 and 635 Ma in central Madagascar corroborate with this model for a transition to a transform continental setting. The pre-Gondwana amalgamation convergence in the Ediacaran-Cambrian, that deformed and metamorphosed all units in central Madagascar units, is accounted for by ca. 550 Ma metamorphic rims on zircon grains from the quartzites in the Itremo Group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→