MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245433117 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2017.8092236

Directional Log-Gabor filtering on the pre-beamformed channel data to enhance hyper echoic structures

2017· article· en· W4245433117 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Zhuang, Robert Rohling, Purang Abolmaesumi

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)Filter (signal processing)AzimuthImaging phantomAcousticsOpticsPhysicsComputer visionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the challenges in ultrasound bone imaging is related to the specular reflection in the soft tissue-bone interface. Since the transmit ultrasound beam is not necessarily perpendicular to the bone surface, the reflected ultrasound signals from bones are often tilted in the channel data. Even though the amount of tilting may not be large, this can still result in cancellation of the bone signals during beamforming, weakening the bone interfaces. In this paper, we have developed a novel beamforming method which applies directional Log-Gabor filtering in channel data prior to the beamforming. The channel data are first delay compensated, and then the directional LogGabor filter are used to enhance signals within +/-15 degrees of horizontal direction (6 dB FWHM). The filtered channel data are then masked based on tensor based-image analysis to suppress noise. Vertebrae phantom studies (10 data sets) and in vivo volunteer studies (30 data sets) show the average contrast ratio (CR) for the bones is improved from 0.57 in delay and sum beamforming (DAS) to 0.91 in the proposed method. Weak bone interfaces such as the spinal process can also be visualized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207