Amphiphilic Block Copolymers as Stabilizers in Emulsion Polymerization: Effects of the Stabilizing Block Molecular Weight Dispersity on Stabilization Performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular weight dispersity is not typically studied as a design parameter of block copolymer stabilizers but is often assumed to impact stabilization performance; low molecular weight dispersity is generally assumed to be associated with best performance. This is the first quantitative investigation of the effects of block copolymer molecular weight dispersity with regards to stabilization performance in an emulsion polymerization. Poly(styrene)- b -poly(acrylic acid) block copolymers were synthesized by nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization and employed as stabilizers in the emulsion polymerization of styrene. The effect of the stabilizing poly(acrylic acid) block molecular weight dispersity on stabilization behavior was studied, independent of molecular weight and composition. Block copolymer stabilizers were evaluated in terms of critical aggregation concentration, dispersed phase particle size, distribution, and zeta potential. The molecular weight dispersity of the stabilizing block affected the aggregation number and final number of particles but displayed no negative effects on stability or size distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it