MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

176-19: Second generation cryoballoon ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients: 12 month safety and efficacy from the STOP-AF post approval study

2016· article· en· W4245653009 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bradley P. Knight, Paul Novak, Robert Sangrigoli, Jean Champagne, Marc Dubuc, Stuart P. Adler, Vidal Essebag, Sandeep Jain, Roy M. John, Moussa Mansour

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationInterim analysisAtrial tachycardiaClinical endpointPulmonary veinAblationAtrial flutterInternal medicineCardiologyProspective cohort studySurgeryCatheter ablationRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The purpose of this interim analysis was to report the safety and 12 month efficacy from the largest prospective multi-center trial evaluating cryoballoon ablation using the second generation cryoballoon (CB2) in the United States and Canada. Methods: The STOP-AF post approval study is a prospective, multi-center, non-randomized study designed to provide long-term safety and efficacy data for cryoballoon ablation. Safety data is presented on the final enrolled cohort of patients treated with CB2 (n = 345). Freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptomatic atrial flutter (AFL) / tachycardia (AT) is presented for patients who had a minimum of 12 months follow-up at the time of this interim analysis (n = 338). Kaplan-Meier estimate was utilized for calculating the primary endpoint. Documented AF lasting longer than 30 seconds and/or a repeat ablation after the 90-day blanking period were considered treatment failures. Results: Upon completion of enrollment, 345 patients were treated with CB2 for drug-refractory, recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal AF. Acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was achieved in 99.4% (343/345) of patients. Of the 345 patients, 338 (98%) had a minimum of 12-months follow-up (mean follow-up 17 ± 7 months). Freedom from AF at 12 months was 82.8% (95% CI: 78.2% to 86.5%) and freedom from AF and symptomatic AFL/AT was 80.0% (95% CI: 75.3% to 84.0%). Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) was unresolved at hospital discharge in 11 patients (3.2%). PNI resolved in 8/11 patients (mean time to resolution = 125 days) and was still present after 12 months in 3 patients (0.9%). Other major events included: cerebrovascular accident (0.3%), PV stenosis (0.6%), pericardial effusion (0.6%), tamponade (0.3%), and hemoptysis (0.9%). No device or procedure related deaths occurred. Conclusions: PVI using the CB2 is a highly effective treatment for patients with drug-refractory recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal AF. This analysis reports freedom from AF of 82.8%, and freedom from all atrial arrhythmias of 80.0% at 12 months. PNI ongoing beyond 12 months is observed in less than 1% of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207