MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245753903 · doi:10.1093/europace/euy015.009

47Characteristics and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in patients without conventional risk factors: A RE-LY AF registry analysis

2018· article· en· W4245753903 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mariëlle Kloosterman, David Conen, J Oldgren, Jorge Wong, Stuart J. Connolly, Álvaro Avezum, Salim Yusuf, Michael D. Ezekowitz, L Wallentin, Marie Ntep-Gweth, Tyler W. Barrett, William F. McIntyre, Ratika Parkash, Isabelle C. Van Gelder, Jeff S. Healey

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentrePopulation Health Research Institute
FundersHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Funding Acknowledgements: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario Mid-Career Award (MC7450), and CVON 2014-9 with support of the Dutch Heart Foundation Background: Lone atrial fibrillation (AF) lacks a widely accepted definition, and data on prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis outside of North America and Western Europe are sparse. Purpose: To study prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes in patients with lone AF from multiple regions of the world included in the RE-LY AF registry. Methods: The RE-LY AF registry prospectively enrolled 15400 patients, between December 2007 and October 2011, who presented to an emergency department with AF from 164 sites in 47 countries. We identified patients with classically-defined lone AF: age<60 years, without hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy, congenital heart disease, pulmonary disease, valve disease, hyperthyroidism, or recent cardiac surgery. All patients with lone AF as secondary diagnosis were manually screened to additionally exclude those with triggered AF (e.g. pericarditis, myocarditis). Results: Classically-defined lone AF was present in 796 patients (5%). In 779 (98%) patients additional risk factors were present, including borderline hypertension (130-140/80-90 mmHg; 47%), kidney disease (eGFR<60 ml/min; 57%), obesity (BMI>30; 19%), diabetes (5%), excessive alcohol intake (>14 units/week; 4%), smoking (25%), and sleep apnea (2%). ‘’Truly lone AF’’, excluding these additional risk factors was extremely rare (17 patients [0.1%]). In North America/Western Europe obesity was common (30%), while excessive alcohol was in Africa (22%), and diabetes in the Middle East (11%). During one year follow-up, patients returned to the emergency department 1.2±1.3 times. Hospitalization for AF was required in 141 (18%) patients, 7 (0.9%) patients were hospitalized for heart failure, of which 3 (8%) in Africa. A total of 13 patients died (1.6%), 5 (0.6%) suffered a stroke, and 3 patients (0.4%) experienced major bleeding without differences between world regions. Conclusions: Classically-defined lone AF is uncommon among patients presenting to the emergency department. It is typically associated with additional risk factors that vary between regions. True lone AF is very rare. During 1 year follow-up lone AF poses a short-term risk of stroke and death, but a high rate of recurrent AF hospitalizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207