MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245775505 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-01/42/1578

Structural and Optical Properties of Luminescent Silicon Carbonitride Thin Films

2014· article· en· W4245775505 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zahra Khatami, Patrick Robert James Wilson, Owen Taggart, Dan R Frisina, Jacek Wójcik, Peter Mascher

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXANESMaterials scienceMonochromatorAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Thin filmPhotoluminescenceSiliconBeamlineOpticsOptoelectronicsSpectroscopyChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of silicon carbonitride (SiCN) thin films, a relatively unstudied material, were fabricated by electron cyclotron resonance plasma enhanced chemical vapour deposition (ECR PECVD) located at McMaster University. For comparison, a set each of silicon nitride and silicon carbide samples were also fabricated. To study the effect of introducing rare earth ions into SiCN host matrix, we synthesised a series of SiCN co-doped with Ce and Tb. This work investigates the influence of film composition and annealing conditions on the luminescence and structure of rare earth doped and undoped SiCN thin films through photoluminescence (PL), X-ray emission (XES), X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments. The XES measurements were measured on Bl. 8.0.1 at the Advanced Light Source in Berkeley, USA. XANES has been carried out on the high resolution spherical grating monochromator (SGM) 11ID-1, soft X-ray microcharacterization beamline (SXRMB) 06B1-1, and variable line spacing plane grating monochromator (VLS PGM) beamline at the Canadian Light Source (CLS) synchrotron facility. PL emission was measured at the room temperature using a 17 mW 325 nm HeCd laser as the excitation source. For both doped and un-doped thin films, the XANES measurements were recorded at the N K-edge, C K-edge, and Si L3,2-edge while total fluorescence yield (TFY), total electron yield (TEY), and partial fluorescence yield (PFY) were simultaneously measured. Both the XES and XANES spectra were calibrated using the same reference materials. For doped sample the XANES spectra of Ce N5,4-edge and Ce M5,4-edge are also measured. The XES measurements included the Ce N5,4, Si L3,2, C K, and N K spectra. XRD also was used to determine the local bonding coordination of rare earth ions when incorporated in amorphous as well as crystalline structures. Film composition was determined using Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) and elastic recoil detection (ERD) analysis carried out at the Tandetron Laboratory at Western University. The thickness of film varying from 170 to 200 nm allowed the conduction of ion beam and X-ray absorption spectroscopy measurements without interference from the substrate. The variable angle spectroscopic (VASE) ellipsometer was employed to investigate the thickness and optical constants of the films. The PL spectra of SiCN samples annealed at the lower temperatures consist of a broad peak ranging from 400 to 700 nm. Bright Ce3+ and Tb3+ related emission lines are observed for the doped films annealed in nitrogen at 1200°C for one hour. TEM analysis reveals the formation of randomly distributed nanocrystals in doped SiCN films following 1200°C annealing, while the undoped SiCN samples did not appear to show any crystalline structure at any temperature. Comparisons of the XANES and XES results indicated that in a the doped SiCN films, structural re-ordering occurs at the higher annealing temperatures leading to the formation of Si clustering along with a decrease in Si-N bonding. Conversely, little to no difference was observed in the electronic structure of undoped SiCN films following annealing at different temperatures. This suggests that the electronic structure of the un-doped SiCN films may not change with respect to the Si and N atoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207