MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4245825151 · doi:10.3138/ecf.25.1.243

Reviews/Comptes Rendus

2012· article· en· W4245825151 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnlightenmentOrientalismArt historyRomanticismArtMAGIC (telescope)HistoryLiteraturePhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urs App, The Birth of Orientalism, reviewed by Kenneth Haynes Chi-ming Yang, Performing China: Virtue, Commerce, and Orientalism in Eighteenth-Century England, 1660–1760, reviewed by Yu Liu David Porter, The Chinese Taste in Eighteenth-Century England, reviewed by Elizabeth Chang Daniel Carey and Lynn Festa, Enlightenment Orientalism: Resisting the Rise of the Novel by Srinivas Aravamudan; and The Postcolonial Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Colonialism and Postcolonial Theory, reviewed by Zak Sitter Donna Landry, Noble Brutes: How Eastern Horses Transformed English Culture, reviewed by Gala Argent Laura Brown, Homeless Dogs and Melancholy Apes: Humans and Other Animals in the Modern Literary Imagination, reviewed by Jane Spencer Tara Ghoshal Wallace, Imperial Characters: Home and Periphery in Eighteenth-Century Literature, reviewed by Norbert Schürer Jin Lu, Images de la France sous la dynastie des Qing, reviewed by Jennifer Tsien Judith Still, Enlightenment Hospitality: Cannibals, Harems, and Adoption, reviewed by Jimmy Casas Klausen Clifford Siskin and William Warner, This Is Enlightenment, reviewed by Jesse Molesworth Dena Goodman, Becoming a Woman in the Age of Letters, reviewed by Heidi Bostic Antoine Hatzenberger, Utopies des Lumiéres, Critique littéraire par Lise Leibacher-Ouvrard Jesse Molesworth, Chance and the Eighteenth-Century Novel: Realism, Probability, Magic, reviewed by John D. Baird Dennis Todd, Defoe’s America, reviewed by Shawn Thomson Karen Junod, “Writing the Lives of Painters”: Biography and Artistic Identity in Britain, 1760–1810, reviewed by Michael Yonan Nicole Reynolds, Building Romanticism: Literature and Architecture in Nineteenth-Century Britain, reviewed by Rachel Ramsey Trude Kolderup, Le Goüt de l’inachévement; esthétique et narration dans l’oeuvre de Marivaux, Critique littéraire par Servanne Woodward Emmanuel Boussuge, Situations de Fougeret de Monbron (1706–1760), Critique littéraire par Jean-Christophe Abramovici Jan Herman, Le Récit génétique au xviiie siécle, Critique littéraire par Marc Escola René Démoris et Florence Magnot-Ogilvy, La Mouche, ou les Aventures de M. Bigand by Chevalier de Mouhy, reviewed by Yves Citton Evan R. Davis, Robinson Crusoe, by Daniel Defoe, reviewed by Elizabeth Kraft Linda Bree, Amelia by Henry Fielding, reviewed by Elizabeth Kraft Samuel Richardson, Clarissa: An Abridged Edition by Samuel Richardson, reviewed by Elizabeth Kraft Laurence Sterne, A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy, reviewed by Elizabeth Kraft

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century FictionSame topicGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesFrench-language works237,207