MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME CONFORMATION AMONG CW‐GROUP CHLOROPHYCEAN ALGAE<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most green algal taxa have circular‐mapping mitochondrial genomes, whereas some have linear genome‐ or subgenomic‐sized mitochondrial DNAs (mtDNA). It is not clear, however, if the circular‐mapping genomes represent genome‐sized circular molecules, if such circular molecules and the linear forms are the predominant in vivo mtDNA structures, or if the linear forms arose only once or multiple times among extant green algal lineages. We therefore examined the DNA components detected with homologous mtDNA probes after pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis of total cellular DNA from the chlorophycean basal bodies displaced clockwise(CW)‐group taxa Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Chlamydomonas moewusii. For C. reinhardtii, the 15.8‐kb linear mtDNA was the only DNA component detected, and there was no evidence of circular or large linear precursors of this DNA. In the case of C. moewusii, which is known to have a circular‐mapping 22.9‐kb mitochondrial genome, three DNA components were detected; these appeared to be circular (relaxed and supercoiled) and genome‐sized linear DNA molecules, the latter of which likely resulted from random double‐strand breaks in the circular forms during DNA isolation. In further studies, DNA from additional CW‐group taxa was examined using conventional gel electrophoresis and DNA‐filter blot analysis with C. reinhardtii and C. moewusii mtDNA probes. We conclude that all taxa from the “Volvox clade” (sensu Nakayama et al. 1996 of the CW‐group have genome‐ or subgenomic‐sized linear mtDNAs as their predominant mtDNA form and that these arose from a genome‐sized circular form in an ancestor that existed near the base of this clade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".