Bibliographic record
Abstract
These volumes represent the cumulative findings of two American scholars who have visited, resided in, and conducted research in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) at regular intervals since the 1980s. Although some chapters of both books are updated versions of articles originally published up to twenty years ago, in their current configuration they offer a longitudinal analysis of more than fifty years of immigration to a state that, until 2005, stubbornly insisted that it was a non-immigration country. Joyce Marie Mushaben and Ruth Mandel approach the issues around immigration and minority integration in Germany through the lenses of their respective disciplines— political science and cultural anthropology—but they share many central concerns and viewpoints. Both focus on the Turkish guest-workers and their families and descendents, analyzing the politics and culture surrounding their arrival and eventual settlement in Germany in the context of the larger waves of flight, resettlement, and labor recruitment that have brought 20 million newcomers to stay on in Germany since the end of World War II. They present Germany’s Turkish population of nearly 2 million as victims of the FRG’s arcane politics of immigration and citizenship. And they describe how, over three generations, in the face of inadequate German policies to integrate them, these guest-workers have begun to integrate themselves, in the process changing their own political culture as well as that of the larger society around them. Both books point to the very different and changing conditions that have shaped the trajectories in the FRG of expellees, co-ethnic resettlers, late resettlers, guest-workers, refugees, and quota refugees, among others. Both scholars underscore the lack of articulation between federal and more local, community-based incorporation policies, which has complicated the processes of settling in for many of Germany’s immigrant groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".