Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis rencana pemekaraan wilayah di Kecamatan Koto Tangah Kota Padang dengan mengetahui faktor apa saja yang mempengaruhi rencana pemekaran wilayah di Kecamatan Koto Tangah ditinjau dari persyaratan administrasi, fisik kewilayahan dan teknis berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerinthan No. 19 Tahun 2008 Tentang Kecamatan. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif kuantitatif dengan pendekatan keruangan. Wilayah penelitian ini adalah Kecamatan Koto Tangah dengan seluruh kelurahan yang ada. Teknik analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah studi literasi, wawancara dan formulasi yang digunakan mengacu ke Peraturan Pemerinthan No. 19 Tahun 2008 Tentang Kecamatan. Analisis kelayakan rencana pemekaran wilayah Kecamatan Koto Tangah dianalisis berdasarkan persyaratan administrasi, fisik kewilayahan dan teknis. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa dari persyaratan administrasi belum layak dimekarkan, sedangkan secara fisik kewilayahan sudah layak dimekarkan dan secara teknis juga sudah layak untuk dimekarkan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.167 | 0.070 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".