Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous article FreeErratumSimone Immler and Sarah Perin OttoSimone Immler1. Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden Search for more articles by this author and Sarah Perin Otto2. Department of Zoology, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada Search for more articles by this author Original articleDriven Apart: The Evolution of Ploidy Differences between the Sexes under Antagonistic Selection.PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreIn “Driven apart: the evolution of ploidy differences between the sexes under antagonistic selection,” by S. Immler and S. P. Otto (American Naturalist 183:96–107), there were a number of errors in figure 2, which appears on page 102: the axis labels in panels B and D were incorrect, and the labels “A fixed” and “a fixed” in panels B and D were reversed. The correct figure 2 appears below.Figure 2. The evolution of ploidy levels in males and females with sex- and ploidy-dependent selection. A, C, Selection varies in diploid females and males along the axes (X: ; Y: ) with remaining parameters set to , , . B, D, Selection varies in haploid females and males (X: ; Y: ), setting and . Dominance in diploids, (defined as in individuals of sex i) was set to (A, B) or (C, D). Dark colors indicate that a polymorphism is maintained, while light colors indicate that either allele A or a is fixed. Color indicates selection on ploidy (gray = increased diploidy favored in both sexes, red = increased diploidy favored in females only, blue = increased diploidy favored in males only, and green = increased haploidy favored in both sexes). Unless otherwise specified, the initial modifier frequency was set to , introducing modifier alleles that increase or decrease the extent of diploidy by 0.01. Panels are based on the weak selection approximations in equations (1) and (2) but are nearly identical to exact numerical calculations. Selection is sexually antagonistic in the top left and bottom right quadrant in all panels. Selection is ploidally antagonistic in at least one sex in all but the bottom left quadrant.View Large ImageDownload PowerPointThe publisher regrets the error. Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 186, Number 6December 2015 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/683773 HistorySubmitted August 21, 2015Accepted August 21, 2015 © 2015 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.Related articlesDriven Apart: The Evolution of Ploidy Differences between the Sexes under Antagonistic Selection.17 Jul 2015The American Naturalist
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.659 | 0.497 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".