MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246180356 · doi:10.1201/b16471-12

CMC Sections of Regulatory Filings and CMC Regulatory Compliance during Investigational and Postapproval Stages

2014· book-chapter· en· W4246180356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompliance (psychology)BusinessPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction ....................................................................................................... 200 Pharmaceutical Quality ..................................................................................... 200 Drug Substance ............................................................................................ 201 Manufacture ................................................................................................. 202 Characterization (Structure Elucidation)...................................................... 204 Control of Drug Substance (Specifications) ................................................. 205 Reference Standards or Materials ................................................................ 206 Container Closure System ............................................................................ 206 Stability ........................................................................................................ 207 Drug Product ............................................................................................... 207 Description and Composition of the Drug Product ................................. 207 Pharmaceutical Development .................................................................. 207 Components of the Drug Product ............................................................ 208 Drug Product Development ..................................................................... 208 Manufacture (Manufacturer(s)/Method of Manufacture) .............................210 Control of Excipients (Specifications) ..........................................................211 Control of Drug Product (Specifications) .....................................................211 Justification of Specification(s) .....................................................................214 Reference Standards or Materials .................................................................214 Container Closure System .............................................................................214 Stability ........................................................................................................ 215 The chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) section of a regulatory filing [investigational new drug (IND), IND amendments, IND annual reports, new drug application (NDA) or biologics license application (BLA), postapproval CMC supplements, and NDA annual reports] contains detailed information pertaining to the characteristics, manufacturing, and quality aspects of the drug substance and drug product. Under the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Common Technical Document (CTD) format,1 the CMC section is referred to as the quality section and the structure is outlined in the ICH CTD guidance.2 This chapter first discusses the details of the quality section of a CTD, followed by how CMC changes are managed during the IND development phases and postapproval stages. As this book addresses the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory affairs, the focus of the discussions is primarily based on the US FDA expectations and requirements. Other health authority requirements such as those found in Europe, Canada, Japan, or China could vary significantly from this chapter with respect to CMC, and the reader is encouraged to seek other reference materials as appropriate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207