MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246270890 · doi:10.4138/1985

Atlantic Geoscience Society & Environmental Earth Sciences Division of the Geological Association of Canada: Abstracts 2000, Joint Meeting & Conference

2000· article· en· W4246270890 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint (building)GeologyDivision (mathematics)Association (psychology)Earth scienceOceanographyEngineeringCivil engineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Few natural sources o f iron occur in the deep ocean.Shipwrecks deposited in this environment introduce massive amounts o f processed iron and iron derivatives unnatural to the deep ocean, providing a new source o f nutrients.As a result, microorganisms normally present in low concentrations are provided with a new iron-rich environment in which they can flourish, thereby creating a unique ecosystem.Studies show that both biological and mineralogical activities play a major role in the corrosive process that forms this unique ecosystem.Micro-organisms precipitate iron-rich minerals, which form the brittle skeleton o f stalactite-like structures termed 'rusticles'.The skeleton supports the newly formed structures, preventing them from washing away in local currents.After more than 70 years o f uninterrupted growth, rusticles now cover the hull o f the RMS Titanic.Little is known about the structure o f rusticles or about the microorganisms involved in their formation.The internal and external surfaces o f rusticles differ in their morphology and mineralogy, suggesting that different bacteria and/or physicalchemical conditions prevailed during their formation.It is believed that more than 2 0 different species o f microorganisms can be found in these structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1860.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeologySame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207