Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emerging out of the Jesuit-led Counter-Reformation, the first manifestations of the Polish baroque, in terms of sacral and secular art and architecture coupled with an artistic and literary flourishing, appeared toward the end of the 16th century; and the era’s end was not seen until around the years 1740–1760, which came with the ascendancy of the ideals of the Enlightenment. The Polish baroque can be understood in a cultural sense as a symbiosis of the tastes and religious passion of the land-owning gentry of the Crown, the patronage of increasingly demagogic magnates, and a broad flourishing of artistic and epistolary expression from among the same caste and landed gentry, made all the more unique by the principle of the “Golden Freedom,” which bestowed a self-regarding liberty on landowners to demonstrate opinions in speech and writing, and to vote and be elected to the local and national assemblies. Central to the Polish baroque was Sarmatism, a belief, born of religious fervor, in the idea that the commonwealth of the gentry was a protectorate of the Catholic faith, and that Poland’s very location, being a buffer for Europe against incursions from the east, was a part of God’s divine plan. Whilst the prevailing liberal and heroic spirit championed the individual over monarchical absolutism and shaped viewpoints that were far from the murderous religious intolerance seen elsewhere in Counter-Reformational Europe, the ruling classes became over time swept up in an expression of religious exaltation, and, so convinced of their sanctified position, accelerated a process of curtailing the burgher and peasant classes, who were forced to accept progressively limited entitlements and privileges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".