MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246390365 · doi:10.1017/ccol0521846765.011

Unitarian dissent

2007· book-chapter· en· W4246390365 on OpenAlexaff
J. A. V. Chapple

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissentPolitical sciencePsychologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“However I told him what I did believe - (more I suppose what would be called Arian than Humanitarian).” Elizabeth Gaskell to Charles Eliot Norton (1861) In 325 the Council of Nicaea declared that God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost exist as three equal persons in a divine unity. Dissenting Protestants ejected from the Church of England in 1662 for refusing to accept the authority of bishops retained this orthodox Trinitarian doctrine, but in the next century some followed Arius ( c .256-336) in the belief that Christ was divine but inferior to God the Father. Others came to believe that Christ was only human, and were insultingly labeled Socinians after two sixteenth-century heretics. Although most anti-Trinitarians held that Christ was a divinely inspired guide and teacher, they were not regarded as Christians, even by other Dissenters. Between 1689 and 1813 denial of the Trinity was technically against the law of England. Unitarian polemics against other legal and political disabilities, and frequent support for French Revolutionary principles, caused many to be ostracized as dangerous radicals. In 1791 ''Church and King'' mobs destroyed the house, library, and papers in Birmingham of Joseph Priestley (1733-1804), famous scientist and leading Unitarian minister, and rioted in Manchester, not long before Elizabeth Gaskell's father arrived to teach in a new college there.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207