MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effect Of Voluntary Training On Glucocorticoid Responsiveness To Restraint Stress In Sprague-Dawley Rats

2005· article· en· W4246451972 on OpenAlexaff
Sergiu Fediuc, Jonathan E. Campbell, Michael C. Riddell

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyGlucocorticoid receptorGlucocorticoidBasal (medicine)Circadian rhythmHippocampal formationTurnoverMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exercise training is a potent activator of the hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis. In rodents, forced training reduces hippocampus glucocorticoid (GC) receptor expression and may cause chronic elevations in basal GC levels. The effects of voluntary training are less clear but have been shown to cause reductions in hippocampal corticosteroid receptor binding and an exaggerated GC response to a novel stress. PURPOSE In the present study, we examined the effects of voluntary training on the diurnal HPA-axis rhythm as well as the responsiveness to, and recovery from restraint stress. METHODS Male, Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into training (T) and sedentary (S) groups (n=8 in each). For 4 weeks, the T rats were individually housed in cages with 24h access to running wheels, while the S rats were individually housed in standard cages. Both groups had free access to food and water. Diurnal plasma GC levels were measured weekly (0800, 1900, 0100h) followed by a standardized restraint stress protocol at the end of 4 weeks. For this, plasma GCs were measured intermittently during 20 min of tube restraint and 95 min of recovery. RESULTS The running distance in T increased from 1997±274m/day (X ± SEM) at week 1 to 8960±146m/day at week 4 (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in adrenal gland size between the two groups. A significant week by group interaction was found for diurnal plasma GC concentrations (p < 0.05). In week one, GC levels were higher in T than in S rats (T = 229±27 ng/ml vs S = 122±14 ng/ml, P=0.002 for data collapsed over time of day) but progressively decreased throughout the training protocol to reach similar values by week 4 (T = 147±17 ng/ml vs S = 112±17 ng/ml, P=NS). During restraint, GC values increased similarly in both groups (67±27 vs 43±11ng/ml at t=0 to 521±57 vs 499±29 ng/ml at t=20 min in T vs S, respectively, P=NS). During recovery, values were also similar between groups and reached basal levels by 80 min (71±15 vs, 53±11 in T vs S, respectively, P= NS). CONCLUSION Voluntary training in rats causes an initial up-regulation in diurnal GC levels, which are restored to normal by 4 weeks of training. Moreover, at 4 weeks, T rats have a normal response and recovery from restraint stress. These findings indicate that voluntary endurance training is associated with an initial hyperactivation of diurnal HPA activity, which is restored to basal by 4 weeks of training. In addition, 4 weeks of training is associated with normal response and recovery to a non-exercise stressor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicStress Responses and Cortisol→French-language works237,207→