MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246463514 · doi:10.29309/tpmj/2017.24.06.1190

SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION;

2017· article· en· W4246463514 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Adnan Bawany, Abdul Aziz Sahito, Falak Naz, Adnan Ali Khahro, Rabail Bohio, Farrukh Bohio, Syeda Fiza Nasir

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Professional Medical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsLu’ma Native Housing Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSexual dysfunctionLiver dysfunctionObservational studyChronic hepatitisLiver diseaseChronic liver diseaseDiseaseComplicationHepatic dysfunctionErectile dysfunctionInternal medicineVirusImmunologyCirrhosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To determine the frequency of sexual dysfunction in the patientssuffering from chronic liver disease. Period: 1 year from June 2013 to May 2014. Study Design:An observational study. Setting: Asian Institute of Medical Sciences. Methodology: 150 casesof chronic liver disease including patients of both genders at Asian Institute of medical scienceswho had suggestive history and signs /symptoms of sexual dysfunction. Results: Study found51.3% of total patients were suffering with sexual dysfunction. Out of all participating females,52.2% were affected and among the total male patients 51% males were suffering from sexualdysfunction. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV) were positive in 76.7% and11.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Sexual dysfunction is a common complication in the patientssuffering from chronic liver disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Professional Medical JournalSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207