MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246467563 · doi:10.11641/pde.83.1_144

Treatment of Cronkhite-Canada syndrome monitored by gastrointestinal endoscopy

2013· article· en· W4246467563 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shin Nishii, Motonori Shimizu, Takeshi Takajo, Yoshitaka Yamashita, Yuichi Yasutake, Hirokazu Sato, Kazuyuki Narimatsu, Chikako Watanabe, Syunsuke Koumoto, Ryota Hokari, Sho Ogata, Atsushi Kawaguchi, Shigeaki Nagao, Soichiro Miura

Bibliographic record

VenueProgress of Digestive Endoscopy · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsNational Defence Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDuodenumGastroenterologyEdemaEndoscopyStomachInternal medicineGastrointestinal bleedingDiarrheaPrednisoloneDuodenitisIleumColonoscopyGastritis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A man in his sixties presented at our hospital with a chief complaint of diarrhea accompanied by nail deformation, skin pigmentation, dysgeusia, anorexia, weight loss and edema of the lower leg. Laboratory data showed malnutrition, and Technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin scan showed positive accumulation in the intestine. On endoscopy, many more polypoid lesions were found in the stomach and colon than in the esophagus, duodenum, and terminal ileum. Background mucosa between polypoid lesions was reddish and edematous. This case was diagnosed as Cronkhite-Canada syndrome, and treatment initiated with intravenous hyperalimentation, prednisolone, sulfasalazopyridine and tranexamic acid. Gastrointestinal endoscopy performed after three months of treatment showed a decrease in the number of polypoid lesions and reduction in mucosal redness and edema. Gastrointestinal endoscopy after nine months’ treatment showed a disappearance of almost all the polypoid lesions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProgress of Digestive EndoscopySame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207