MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)

2018· book-chapter· en· W4246486212 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicResearch, Science, and Academia
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilArts and Humanities Research CouncilDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaScience and Engineering Research BoardSavoy FoundationSociety of Architectural HistoriansSamuel H. Kress Foundation
KeywordsResearch councilHumanitiesSociologyLibrary scienceArtSocial scienceComputer sciencePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Training Portfolio, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, 350 Albert Street, PO Box 1610, Ottawa, ON K1P 6G4, Canada Tel: 613 943 7777 Fax: 613 943 1329 Email: fellowships@sshrc-crsh.gc.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1370.067

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.538
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.085 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicResearch, Science, and AcademiaFrench-language works237,207