MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246516515 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316257593.001

S. D. Myers Inc. <i>v</i>. Government of Canada

2005· article· en· W4246516515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueICSID Reports · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInternational Arbitration and Investment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpropriationArbitrationDamagesInternational arbitrationInternational trade lawTransparency (behavior)LawJurisdictionBusinessPrincipal (computer security)CommissionInvestment protectionEconomicsInternational tradePolitical scienceForeign direct investmentInternational investment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3 Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Investor commencing arbitration proceedings under NAFTA Chapter 11 — Whether Canada violating NAFTA Articles 1102, 1105, 1106 and 1110 Arbitration — NAFTA Chapter 11 — Procedure — UNCITRAL arbitration — Due process — Discovery — Claim of Crown privilege Treaties — NAFTA — Investment protection — Discrimination — NAFTA Article 1102 — Fair and equitable treatment of investment — Article 1105 — Requirement of transparency — Performance requirements — Article 1106 — Environmental protection — Whether compatible with NAFTA principles Environment — Hazardous waste — Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, 1989 — NAFTA — Balance between environmental protection and free and open trade Expropriation — Definition — NAFTA Article 1110 — Conduct tantamount to expropriation — Distinction between expropriation and regulation State responsibility — Federal States — Responsibility for acts of State and local government — International Law Commission Draft Articles on State Responsibility Municipal law — Judicial review of NAFTA award in Canadian courts — Canada making application to Federal Court of Canada — Canada seeking to set aside First Partial Award Damages — Appropriate primary measure of compensation — Scope of recovery — Review of principles concerning assessment of compensation — Appreciation of evidence — Interpretation of applicable law — Quantification of compensation — Value of lost and delayed net income streams — Methodology of quantification — Interest Costs — Arbitration costs — Costs of legal representation and assistance — Applicable rules — Article 38 of UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules — Article 40(1) and (2) of UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules — Success of parties in principal phases of arbitration — Apportionment — Circumstances of case — International practice — Interest Interest — On Award on Damages — On Award on Costs — Rate of interest — Currency of account in which award of compensation made — Date from which interest payable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4120.148

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueICSID ReportsSame topicInternational Arbitration and Investment LawFrench-language works237,207