S. D. Myers Inc. <i>v</i>. Government of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3 Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Investor commencing arbitration proceedings under NAFTA Chapter 11 — Whether Canada violating NAFTA Articles 1102, 1105, 1106 and 1110 Arbitration — NAFTA Chapter 11 — Procedure — UNCITRAL arbitration — Due process — Discovery — Claim of Crown privilege Treaties — NAFTA — Investment protection — Discrimination — NAFTA Article 1102 — Fair and equitable treatment of investment — Article 1105 — Requirement of transparency — Performance requirements — Article 1106 — Environmental protection — Whether compatible with NAFTA principles Environment — Hazardous waste — Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, 1989 — NAFTA — Balance between environmental protection and free and open trade Expropriation — Definition — NAFTA Article 1110 — Conduct tantamount to expropriation — Distinction between expropriation and regulation State responsibility — Federal States — Responsibility for acts of State and local government — International Law Commission Draft Articles on State Responsibility Municipal law — Judicial review of NAFTA award in Canadian courts — Canada making application to Federal Court of Canada — Canada seeking to set aside First Partial Award Damages — Appropriate primary measure of compensation — Scope of recovery — Review of principles concerning assessment of compensation — Appreciation of evidence — Interpretation of applicable law — Quantification of compensation — Value of lost and delayed net income streams — Methodology of quantification — Interest Costs — Arbitration costs — Costs of legal representation and assistance — Applicable rules — Article 38 of UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules — Article 40(1) and (2) of UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules — Success of parties in principal phases of arbitration — Apportionment — Circumstances of case — International practice — Interest Interest — On Award on Damages — On Award on Costs — Rate of interest — Currency of account in which award of compensation made — Date from which interest payable
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".