MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4246528609 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-16251/v1

X-linked muscular dystrophy in a Labrador Retriever strain: phenotypic and molecular characterization.

2020· preprint· en· W4246528609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Inès Barthélémy, Nadège Calmels, Robert B. Weiss, Laurent Tiret, Adeline Vulin, Nicolas Wein, Cécile Peccate, Carole Drougard, Christophe Béroud, Nathalie Deburgrave, Jean‐Laurent Thibaud, Catherine Escriou, Isabel Punzón, Luis Garcı́a, Jean‐Claude Kaplan, Kevin M. Flanigan, France Leturcq, Stéphane Blot

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institutes of HealthCentres de Recerca de Catalunya
KeywordsLabrador RetrieverStrain (injury)PhenotypeMuscular dystrophyGeneticsMedicineBiologyPathologyAnatomyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Canine models of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are valuable to evaluate therapies because they faithfully reproduce the human disease. Several cases of dystrophinopathies have been described in canines, but the GRMD (Golden Retriever Muscular Dystrophy) model remains the one used in most preclinical studies. Methods We report a new spontaneous dystrophinopathy in a Labrador retriever strain, named LRMD (Labrador Retriever Muscular Dystrophy), for which a colony was established. Fourteen LRMD dogs were followed-up and compared to the GRMD standard. Results The clinical features of the GRMD disease were found in LRMD dogs, and the functional tests provided data roughly overlapping those measured in GRMD dogs, with similar inter-individual heterogeneity. Molecular techniques including RNA-sequencing allowed to map and identify the LRMD causal mutation, consisting in a 2.2-Mb inversion disrupting the DMD gene within its intron 20, and involving TMEM47 gene. In skeletal muscles, the Dp71 isoform was ectopically expressed as a probable consequence of the mutation. We found no evidence of polymorphism in the two LTBP4 and Jagged1 modifier genes that would explain the observed inter-individual variability. Conclusions This study provides a full comparative description of a new spontaneous canine dystrophinopathy, that we demonstrate is phenotypically equivalent to the GRMD model. We report a novel large DNA mutation within the DMD gene and provide evidence that LRMD is a relevant model to pinpoint additional DMD modifier genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→