Neutral and Cationic Hydridoruthenium Tetrakiscarbene Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Incorrect 1H NMR data were reported for [RuCl2(IMe)4] (1) in the original manuscript.1 The correct values are as follows: 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ = 1.80 (s, 24 H, CCH3), 3.72 (s, 24 H, NCH3). We thank Prof. Deryn E. Fogg (University of Ottawa, Canada) for making us aware of this mistake. We further wish to comment on the NMR assignment reported for [RuH(IMe)4][BEt4] (3BEt4). As described in the original manuscript,1 this compound was isolated as a mixture with two minor products, which we tentatively identified as the putative THF adduct [RuH(IMe)4(thf)][BEt4] (3thf) and an unknown hydroborane species. We have now come to different conclusions regarding the nature of these minor products. A reassessment of the original data and reports by Whittlesey and co-workers2, 3 suggest that the minor components likely are the dihydride [RuH2(IMe)4] (2),1, 2 and the dihydrogen complex [Ru(H)(η2-H2)(IMe)4][BEt4] (4BEt4).[3] The assignment of the 1H NMR data should be corrected accordingly, the corrected assignment is given below. 1H NMR integration indicates that 2/3BEt4/4BEt4 are present in a 4:89:7 ratio at 220 K. Broadening of the hydride signals at δ = ‒40.0 and ‒9.00 ppm was observed at temperatures >220 K. This might be caused by intermolecular exchange between 3BEt4 and 4BEt4. 1H NMR Data for [RuH(IMe)4][BEt4] (3BEt4) and Minor Products: 1H NMR (400 MHz, [D8]THF, 300 K): δ = ‒39.9 (br., νFWHM = 400 Hz, 0.86 H, HRu of 3BEt4), ‒8.15 (s, νFWHM = 6.0 Hz, 0.06 H, H2Ru of 2), ‒4.04 (s, νFWHM = 11.0 Hz, 0.26 H, Ru–η2-H2 of 4BEt4), ‒0.17 (m, 8 H, JH-11B = 4.0 Hz, JH-10B = 1.3 Hz, JH-H = 7.8 Hz, BCH2CH3 of [BEt4]‒), 0.60 (m, 12 H, JH-11B = 2.9 Hz, JH-10B = 1.0 Hz, JH-H = 7.8 Hz, BCH2CH3 of [BEt4]‒), 1.96 (s, 0.7 H, CCH3 of 2; this signal partiallyoverlaps with the signal at δ = 2.04 ppm), 2.04 (s, 26 H, overlapping CCH3 signals of 3BEt4 and 4BEt3), 3.13 (s, 26 H, overlapping NCH3 signals of 3BEt4 and 4BEt3), 3.33 (s, 0.7 H, NCH3 of 2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, [D8]THF, 220 K): δ = ‒40.0 (br. s, νFWHM = 40 Hz, 0.86 H, HRu of 3BEt4), ‒8.99 (s, νFWHM = 9 Hz, 0.14 H, RuH of 4BEt3), ‒8.33 (s, νFWHM = 8 Hz, 0.05 H, H2Ru of 2), ‒4.20 (s, νFWHM = 31.1 Hz, 0.28 H, Ru–η2-H2 of 4BEt4), ‒0.23 (br., νFWHM = 21 Hz, 8 H, BCH2CH3), 0.56 (br., νFWHM = 18 Hz, 12 H, BCH2CH3), 1.96 (s, 0.6 H, CCH3 of 2), 2.04 (s, 26 H; overlapping CCH3 signals of 3BEt4 and 4BEt3), 3.03 (s, 2 H, NCH3 of 4BEt3), 3.13 (s, 24 H, NCH3 of 3BEt3), 3.30 (s, 0.6 H, NCH3 of 2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".