MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246713006 · doi:10.5539/jfr.v7n6p138

Reviewer Acknowledgements for Journal of Food Research, Vol. 7 No. 6

2018· article· en· W4246713006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicResearch on scale insects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceCzechPolitical scienceHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal of Food Research wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Their help and contributions in maintaining the quality of the journal are greatly appreciated. Journal of Food Research is recruiting reviewers for the journal. If you are interested in becoming a reviewer, we welcome you to join us. Please find the application form and details at http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jfr/editor/recruitment and e-mail the completed application form to jfr@ccsenet.org. Reviewers for Volume 7, Number 6   Anna Maria Pappalardo, University of Catania, Italy Antonella Santillo, University of Foggia, Italy Bojana Filipcev, University of Novi Sad, Serbia Cheryl Rosita Rock, California State University, United States Codina Georgiana Gabriela, Stefan cel Mare University Suceava, Romania Corina-aurelia Zugravu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Romania Diego A. Moreno-Fernández, CEBAS-CSIC, Spain Domitila Augusta Huber, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil Elsa M Goncalves, Instituto Nacional de Investigacao Agrária, Portugal Jasdeep Saini, WTI (world Technology Ingredients), Inc., United States Jelena Dragisic Maksimovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia Kamila Goderska, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poland Lenka Kourimska, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic Magdalena Polak-Berecka, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland Massimiliano Renna, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy Milla Santos, Universidade Federal De Uberlandia, Brazil Mwanza Mulunda, North West University, South Africa Na-Hyung Kim, Wonkwang University, Korea Richard Nyanzi, Tshwane University of Technology, South Africa Slavica Grujic, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bosnia Herzegovina Suresh Kumar, Hanyang University, Korea Teodora Emilia Coldea, Univ. of AG Sciences & Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Romania Winny Routray, McGill University, Canada Yong Yang, University of Maryland, USA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.135
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.135
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.281
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it