MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4246732024 · doi:10.1002/9781119230793.ch9

Food Freezing

2017· other· en· W4246732024 on OpenAlexaff
İbrahim Dinçer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlanchingFood scienceCongelationFood preservationFood industryFreezing pointIce creamChemistryThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter introduces food freezing as one of the most significant food preservation technologies and discusses the technical, thermal and nutritional aspects of food freezing and freeze-drying applications, and technical aspects of food freezing and freeze-drying systems. Many firmly believe or actively promote the idea that quick freezing is essential for a high-quality product. Enthalpy is known as heat content, leading to the energy level of a product, and is very useful for frozen foods. Since ice formation is responsible for most of the detrimental changes that occur during freezing, a clear understanding of crystallization is essential to minimize freezing damage. Moisture migration in food products during frozen storage can have detrimental effects on quality. Throughout the freezing process the total weight loss is of major concern. The development of the enzymes and microorganisms in certain fruits and vegetables is stopped by blanching before freezing, otherwise these products lose their green color and become brown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMeat and Animal Product Quality→French-language works237,207→