Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2014), "List of Contributors", Advances in Group Processes (Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 31), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-614520140000031009 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Joseph Berger Department of Sociology, Stanford University, CA, USA Peter J. Burke Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA Richard Chacon Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Winthrop University, SC, USA Yamilette Chacon Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Winthrop University, SC, USA Mamadi Corra Department of Sociology, East Carolina University, NC, USA Pamela Emanuelson Department of Sociology and Anthropology, North Dakota State University, ND, USA Steven Gilham Independent Scholar Wesley S. Huey Division of Leadership, Education and Development, United States Naval Academy, MD, USA James A. Kitts University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Sociology, MA, USA Edward J. Lawler School of Industrial and Labor Relations and Department of Sociology, Cornell University, NY, USA Danielle Lewis Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Yue Liu Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Michael J. Lovaglia Department of Sociology, University of Iowa, IA, USA Jeffrey W. Lucas Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, MD, USA Neil J. MacKinnon Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Guelph, ON, Canada David Melamed Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Hyomin Park Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Travis Patton Department of Sociology, Morehouse College, GA, USA Marek N. Posard Department of Sociology, University of Maryland, MD, USA Dawn T. Robinson Department of Sociology, University of Georgia, GA, USA Brent Simpson Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Jan E. Stets Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA Shane R. Thye Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Aaron Vincent Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA David G. Wagner Department of Sociology, University at Albany, SUNY, NY, USA Henry Walker Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, AZ, USA Murray Webster Jr. Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, USA David Willer Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Jeongkoo Yoon School of Business Administration, Ewha Womans University, South Korea Morris Zelditch Jr. Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Jingwen Zhong Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Book Chapters Advances in Group Processes Advances in Group Processes Advances in Group Processes Copyright Page Twenty-Five Years of the Group Processes Conference: A Review Essay List of Contributors Preface Expectation States Theory: Growth, Opportunities and Challenges The Development of Identity Theory Relational Cohesion, Social Commitments, and Person-to-Group Ties: Twenty-Five Years of a Theoretical Research Program Back to the Future: 25 Years of Research in Affect Control Theory Elementary Theory: 25 Years of Expanding Scope and Increasing Precision ☆ Authors are ordered first by number of sections contributed and then alphabetically. The first author is solely responsible for errors. Perceptions of Ability and Adherence to Rules, Guidelines, and Tradition Referent Networks and Distributive Justice Beyond Networks in Structural Theories of Exchange: Promises from Computational Social Science
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it