MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4246908656 · doi:10.1017/9781780688480.008

Canada

2019· book-chapter· en· W4246908656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Giroux, Vanessa Gruben

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersentia eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstitutionLawFederalismFederalistPolitical scienceJurisdictionLegislatureCriminal jurisdictionSeparation of powersState (computer science)Charter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian federation was constituted in 1867, inspired by the American Constitution for its federalist system and by the British government for its parliamentary system and constitutional monarchy. It is now composed of ten provinces and three territories. The key characteristic of the Canadian system is the division of executive and legislative powers between the federal and provincial governments. All laws must respect the Canadian Constitution, including the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms. Generally, laws regulating adults and children relationships (e.g. parentage, adoption, filiation) fall under the jurisdiction of the provinces or territories. So these laws vary from one jurisdiction to another. That justifies the overview approach we have chosen to present the rules governing these issues in Canada. The federal government is responsible for formation of marriage and divorce and it also has other general powers such as the criminal law power, the spending power, as well as residual powers over matters not assigned by the constitution to provinces and territories. Some matters could be of concurrent jurisdictions (e.g. surrogacy and artificial reproduction for the criminal law implications). There can be complex interactions at times between provincial/territorial and federal law (e.g. Reference re Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 2010 SCC 61). In the province of Quebec, the civil law system is applicable to relationships between persons and property, inspired by the French Napoleonic code, but the relationship between the state and persons has been governed by the common law of English origin. The common law applies in the rest of Canada, either in private or public matters. CHANGES IN THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY A. MOTHERS 1. Is maternity automatically established by the birth certificate? In general, maternity is automatically established by the act of birth in Quebec (art. 523 CCQ), regardless of the circumstances of the child's birth. The adage mater semper certa est is of application in Quebec civil law. Hence, the woman who gives birth to the child is deemed to be the mother of the child. Nevertheless, a declaration from the mother to the registrar of civil status within 30 days of the birth of a child is still required. Failure to declare within that period of time is subject to a fine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntersentia eBooksSame topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207