Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the Editor Steven Franks In these pages you will find three articles, two dealing with syntax and one addressing problems of phonology, as well as four reviews. Coincidentally, the papers by Bethin, Fitzgibbons, and Lavine all deal with East Slavic. The books reviewed, on the other hand, reflect the diversity of the field, ranging from Polish phonology to Czech syntax to diachronic morphology to Ukrainian sociolinguistics. The attentive reader will notice that a different review of Bilaniuk's book already appeared in volume 17; these were accidentally commissioned independently but complement each other nicely. An additional feature of this issue is a short In Memoriam piece reflecting on the life and work of recently deceased Croatian linguist Dalibor Brozović. I invite readers to contribute such memorial columns, which we will print to serve the profession, to highlight the achievements of our deceased colleagues, and to provide an enduring record of the field's inevitable transitions. In the same spirit, I once again call upon our readership to consider submitting to JSL a topical Reflections piece. If you would like the opportunity to publish an editorial of general professional interest, please contact me directly with your proposal. As this issue of JSL goes to press, plans are underway to hold the fifth annual meeting of the Slavic Linguistics Society, to take place 29–31 October 2010 at the University of Chicago. I encourage you to submit abstracts and to attend this meeting. The first deadline for abstract submission, 30 April 2010, is fast approaching, but it has just been decided to add a second deadline of 15 June 2010. Those who require earlier notification of acceptance should submit by the first deadline and will be informed by 1 June 2010; those who submit by 15 July will be informed by 1 September 2010. Please consult http://lucian.uchicago.edu/blogs/sls2010/ or send email to SlavicLinguisticSociety2010@gmail.com for additional information. I hope to see you all there! Slavic linguistics is an increasingly vibrant field. We owe this to the organizers, speakers, and other participants of the various meetings which have flourished in Europe, the U.S., and Canada, and of course [End Page 1] to our JSL authors and reviewers. I am very grateful to our dedicated group of Associate Editors, the diverse members of our Editorial Board, and to Managing/Technical Editor Rosemarie Connolly especially, for putting so much time and energy into JSL. A final note: JSL as always is interested in new manuscripts for consideration. However, we remind you that, as the journal of SLS, we require all authors of published papers to be paid members of the Society, just as all presenters at the annual meetings must be. We ask that potential authors who are not members of SLS join. [End Page 2] Steven Franks Editor-in-Chief Copyright © 2010 Steven Franks
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.293 | 0.236 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".