Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous articleNext article Free2021 AnnouncementPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThe Wordsworth-Coleridge Association Is Sponsoring a Scholarly Session at the Modern Language Association Convention in Toronto, January 7–10, 2021Romanticism and WildernessProgram arranged by the Wordsworth-Coleridge Association.Presiding: Charles Waite Mahoney, University of Connecticut.Date and location to be announced.1. “Picturesque Wilderness and the Human Problem,” Markus Poetzsch, Wilfrid Laurier University2. “A Local Habitation, Not a Name: The Preservation of Wildness in Wordworth’s Poems on the Naming of Places,” Cassandra Falke, Arctic University of Norway3. “Walter Scott’s Wilderness Borders,” Kyle McAuley, Seton Hall University4. “The Rewilding of Dorothy Wordsworth,” Lisa Vargo, University of SaskatchewanRespondent: James C. McKusick, University of Missouri–Kansas City Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Wordsworth Circle Volume 51, Number 3Summer 2020New Directions in Romanticism Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/710967 Views: 191Total views on this site © 2020 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it