Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This issue• brings us reflections from far-flung areas of the world: England, Taiwan, Turkey, and China.The URAM project continues to appeal to scholars of highly diverse cultural backgrounds and is now yielding interesting cross-cultural analyses of the search for ultimate reality and meaning that attempt to locate similarities in their approaches.Professor Noel Boulting of the Mid-Kent College of Higher and Further Education, in Kent, England, examines the thought of a countryman, the great philosopher Thomas Hobbes, and his system of 'Motional Materialism'.Dr. John Cheng brings us a ground breaking comparison of St. Thomas Aquinas's understanding of God as 'Truth Itself', and the concept of Qi as presented in the Guanzi' s Four Daoist Chaptei's.From Turkey; Dr. Ismail Latif Hacinebioglu offers us his thoughts on the epistemological bases of religious thought, as written from the Turkish perspective.Finally, Mr. Xianpeng Qiu of the Chinese National Museum of Ethnology in Beijing discusses the importance of shamanism in the culture system of the Oroqen ethnic minority of northern China.To be sure, each of.these scholars brings a very different preparation and a very different method of analysis to the study of ultimate reality and meaning.Yei, interestingly, each paper demonstrates that the quest for meaning In these diverse cultures is the same: the attempt to meld everyday experiences with the human longing for transcendence.•
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it