Percepções de adolescentes gestantes sobre a gravidez atendidas na clínica de pré-natal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exploratory and descriptive study, of qualitative boarding, whose objective was to know the pregnants adolescents perceptions attended in the Clinics Hospital’s prenatal care of the University Federal of Pernambuco. An interview structured script was elaborated with nine structured questions for the individual informations collects, through interview recorded, from nine adolescents has been selected based on the following criteria: 1) pregnant adolescents from 10 to 19 years; 2) pregnant adolescents between the second and the third quarter of pregnancy. The interviews were transcribed in the integrate and grouped at four units themes: 1) Difficulty for defined adolescence and his social role; 2) Challenge of the pregnancy in the adolescence; 3) Expectations projected about the pregnancy; 4) Feelings ambiguity regarding pregnancy. Findings were prominent the difficulties and emotional tangle lived by the pregnants adolescents showing up inexperience and immaturity, becoming, at the beginning, to pregnancy with conflicts; also, the expectations and projections carried out from the individual experiences, transferring for her baby some frustrations and sharing happy moments. Keywords : T eenage; Pregnancy; Perceptions; Pregnants adolescents
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".