MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247286483 · doi:10.1017/s1052150x00010630

BEQ volume 15 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

2005· article· en· W4247286483 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBusiness Ethics Quarterly · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSanta Clara UniversityUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaUniversity of Notre DameLoyola University ChicagoYeshiva UniversityDePaul UniversityFairfield UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaFranklin and Marshall CollegeUniversity of St. ThomasCarnegie Mellon UniversityNorthwestern UniversityUniversity of Northern IowaHarvard UniversityUniversity of CambridgeBoston CollegeWake Forest UniversityCity University of New YorkUniversity of Washington
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Front (military)Content (measure theory)Action (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsMechanical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Business Ethics Quarterly is the journal of The Society for Business Ethics (www.societyforbusinessethics.org), a non-affiliated international association of persons interested in business ethics. The purpose of BEQ is to publish scholarly articles from a wide variety of disciplinary orientations dealing with the application of ethics to the business community. The journal addresses theoretical, methodological, and issue-based questions that can advance ethical inquiry or improve the ethical performance of business organizations. With the contemporary focus on international business, the journal is particularly interested in articles that discuss global business and economic concerns. The journal is also interested in the value dimensions of gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, and culture, and how these factors affect and are affected by business questions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.287

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it