MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247428022 · doi:10.1139/z00-104

Behaviour and daily activity of the squirrel <i>Sciurus ingrami</i> in a secondary araucaria forest in southern Brazil

2000· article· en· W4247428022 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marcelo Oscar Bordignon, Emygdio L. A. Monteiro‐Filho

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorningBiologySciurusPopulationMatingAnimal scienceSeasonalityAraucariaEcologyPopulation densityBotanyHabitatDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A study on the behaviour of a population of squirrels, the "serelepe" (Sciurus ingrami), was conducted in a secondary araucaria forest in southern Brazil. Forty-three squirrels were marked and observed between 05:00 and 18:00 daily. The largest number of males were trapped during the winter, coinciding with an increase in the number of agonistic encounters and mating chases. Two peaks in occurrence of trapped pregnant females were found, one during the winter and the other in the summer. The population density was 0.89 squirrels/ha and the mean area occupied by males was larger during the winter mating period, decreasing gradually during subsequent seasons. The diurnal activity of S. ingrami exhibited bimodal curves in all seasons, with one peak in the morning and another in the afternoon. During the winter, the morning peak was greater in amplitude than during the other seasons. In the spring and summer, a marked increase in the activity of the squirrels during the hottest hours occurred. The morning peak of activity occurred earlier in the spring and summer and later in the autumn and winter. The daily time spent inrest, displacement, feeding, and maintenance showed seasonal variation similar to that shown by other sciurids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207