MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247470730 · doi:10.12943/anr.2013.0021

Vol 2, no. 1

2014· article· en· W4247470730 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mark D. Griffiths, R.H. Lumsden, Brian V. Luloff, N. Zahn, Nandi Simpson, D.V. Altiparmakov, Douglas B. Barber, Nirmal V. Gnanapragasam, Donald Ryland, S. Suppiah, Carolin T. Turner, R.F. Wichman, James F. Alexander, V. Chugh, R. Parmar, J Schut, J.R. Sherin, Hui Xie, D. Zobin, G. Bentoumi, R. Didsbury, G. Jonkmans, Luı́s Rodrigo, B. Sur

Bibliographic record

VenueAECL Nuclear Review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFusion materials and technologies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaBruce Power (Canada)Atomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For nickel-containing alloys irradiated in thermalized neutron fluxes the formation and reaction of 59 Ni with thermal neutrons can lead to time-varying changes in displacement damage rate, expressed as displacements per atom per second (dpa.s 1 ), gas formation and nuclear heating. Ni-rich alloys are used in PWR and BWR reactors as spacers within fuel assemblies but also as tensioning springs for these same assemblies. Flux thimbles have also been made from Ni-rich alloys in the past but are gradually being replaced by thimbles made from other alloys containing substantially less Ni. In a CANDU reactor Ni-alloys are used as tensioning springs, fuel channel spacers (in the form of garter springs) and as cable sheathing and core wires in flux detector assemblies. Prediction of the irradiation processes that affect the functionality of these CANDU internals, such as irradiation embrittlement and irradiation creep, especially under conditions of extended operation, necessitates a consideration of the effect of the transmutation of Ni.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2280.140

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAECL Nuclear ReviewSame topicFusion materials and technologiesFrench-language works237,207