Bibliographic record
Abstract
Growth in the world economy slowed somewhat during 2004 as the US, China and Japan all approached full capacity, and the second and the third quarters of 2004 saw relatively lower growth in these economies. We anticipate that with well managed macroeconomic policies growth should slow as any economy reaches full capacity, but we do not see these developments as signs indicating a sustained and noticeable slowing of the world economy. We expect that world growth will slow from a peak of 4.5 per cent in 2004 to around 4 per cent in 2005 and 2006. Growth appears to be robust in Latin America and in the former Soviet Republics, and domestic demand appears to be strong in the majority of members of OPEC. Growth in the Euro Area slowed noticeably in the third quarter of 2004, partly as a result of the impact of the sharp rise in the oil price, which also affected growth in other regions, but there is mounting evidence that domestic demand is weak. Our estimates of the output gap in the US, the Euro Area, Japan and China suggest that there is only limited spare capacity available in the world economy, and that much of it is located in Europe. Given this, we anticipate that global inflationary pressures will not moderate and that OECD inflation will rise from less than 2 per cent in 2002 and 2003 to above 2 per cent in 2005 and 2006.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".