MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247628365 · doi:10.1093/yiel/yvw018

4. Arctic

2015· article· en· W4247628365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David VanderZwaag

Bibliographic record

VenueYearbook of International Environmental Law · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticPolar codePolitical scienceNinthEnvironmental protectionBusinessEnvironmental planningGeographyOceanographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regional initiatives relevant to Arctic environmental protection occurred mainly through the Arctic Council. The council’s ninth ministerial meeting was held in Iqaluit, Canada, and the council’s six working groups continued their co-operative efforts. Documentation from the ministerial meeting and working groups may be found at the council’s website ( ). Other international activities of note included: efforts by the Arctic five coastal states (Arctic 5) towards preventing unregulated high seas fishing in the central Arctic Ocean (CAO) and enhancing protection of polar bears; convening of the fifteenth session of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council; establishment of the Arctic Coast Guard Forum; and final adoption within the International Maritime Organization (IMO) of a Polar Shipping Code. A highlight of the year was the ninth ministerial meeting of the Arctic Council on 24 April in Iqaluit and the issuance of the Iqaluit Declaration 2015. The declaration devotes considerable attention to protecting the unique Arctic environment. Representatives welcomed the launch of the Arctic Adaptation Exchange Portal, which will allow Arctic communities to exchange experiences and best practices in adapting to a changing climate. Arctic states and observers were urged to continue their monitoring and assessment efforts for existing and emerging contaminants. Governments were urged to ratify the Minamata Convention on Mercury in order to promote its entry into force as soon as possible. The meeting welcomed the Framework Plan for Cooperation on Prevention of Oil Pollution from Petroleum and Maritime Activities in the Marine Areas of the Arctic and decided to begin implementing the Framework Plan through various means, including by regular exchanges of experiences among Arctic offshore petroleum regulators. Governments were urged to apply the Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines: Systems Safety Management and Safety Culture. A decision was also reached to continue work on a pan-Arctic network of marine protected areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2290.183

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYearbook of International Environmental LawSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207