MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4247643291 · doi:10.5383/ijtee.12.01.005

Finite Element Analysis with COMSOL Code for Air Flow and Thermal Convection in Sealed Attic Spaces with Experimental Validation

2015· article· en· W4247643291 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Antonio Campo, Jaime Sieres

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Thermal and Environmental Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtticNusselt numberFinite element methodMechanicsStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesGrashof numberBoussinesq approximation (buoyancy)Aspect ratio (aeronautics)Natural convectionFlow (mathematics)ThermalConvectionMeteorologyGeologyGeometryMaterials scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysicsMathematicsRayleigh numberRoofReynolds numberTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The scope of the present paper is concerned with the numerical prediction of the confined air flow characteristics and thermal convection patterns in sealed attic spaces in roofs with upper inverted V-shapes and horizontal suspended ceilings of conventional houses and buildings. For these isosceles triangular cavities, two relevant cases involve prescribed wall temperatures wherein the bottom base wall is cooled/heated and the upper two inclined walls are symmetrically heated/cooled during the summer and winter seasons. Based on finite element analysis, the COMSOL code is implemented to perform numerical solutions of the two-dimensional system of coupled NavierStokesBoussinesq and energy equations. The computational domain is made coincident with the physical domain to handle potential non-symmetric velocities and non-symmetric temperatures that may occur when exposed to vigorous air flows. The numerical solution via finite elements provides the two velocity fields u (x, y), v (x, y) and the temperature field T (x, y) for the confined air flows. Overall, the target design quantity is the mean wall heat fluxes w q varying with the attic aspect ratio and the temperature difference at two opposing walls. The predicted w q values match the experimental measurements for the two distinct cases related to summer and winter seasons. At the end, comprehensive correlation equations are constructed for the quantification of the mean Nusselt number in terms of the Grashof number and the attic aspect ratio, which could be used in building science research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Thermal and Environmental EngineeringSame topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207