MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4247945150 · doi:10.24124/2012/bpgub871

Investigating the effects of expressing APE1 human population variants in cellular systems.

2012· dissertation· en· W4247945150 on OpenAlexaff
Conan Ma

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsCanadian HeritageUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndoribonucleaseBiologyPopulationPhenotypeGeneticsRNAMolecular biologyCell biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is a multi-functional mammalian protein which has recently been shown to possess the ability to endonucleolytically cleave single-stranded RNA and abasic RNA. Several population variants of APE1 (L104R, E126D and D148E) are known to exist in the human population. L104R and E126D have been linked to Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis while D148E has been linked to various cancers. The exact molecular mechanisms which correlate these variants with human disease are currently unknown. Recent evidence has shown that the in vitro endoribonuclease activities of these variants are different from the wild-type APE1 protein. Here, we hypothesize that the altered endoribonuclease activity of APE1 population variants may be associated with phenotype changes leading to disease pathogenesis. The goal of this thesis was to determine whether APE1 population variants can cause an altered phenotype when expressed in prokaryotic (Origami™ (DE3) cells) and eukaryotic systems (HeLa cervical cancer and HepG2 hepatoma cancer cell lines). Subsequently, these changes were to be linked to altered endoribonuclease activity of these variants. Using two separate assays, it was shown that the L104R and E126D variants possess enhanced cytotoxicity to Origami™ (DE3) cells. This correlates with their distinct endoribonuclease activity demonstrated in vitro. The D148E variant, which had lost endoribonuclease activity, had no effect on colony formation and growth of Origami™(DE3) cells. Interestingly, this study also showed that, when over-expressed, the L104R and E126D variants are capable of causing enhanced growth in the mammalian HepG2 cells. Preliminary microarray and quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction experiments were conducted in an attempt to understand the mechanism for the L104R-induced cell growth in HepG2 cells. Unfortunately, the results were inconclusive. In summary, this thesis has demonstrated a solid correlation between having distinct endoribonuclease act

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRNA Research and Splicing→French-language works237,207→