Efficacy and safety of knee flexion enhanced standardized home exercise program comparing supervised physiotherapy to improve mobility and quality of life after Total knee arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: In the present study, we introduced a knee flexion enhanced standardized home exercise program assisted by a low stool and evaluate efficiency of this method in the management of rehabilitation after TKA. Methods: Patients were recruited from July 2014 and December 2015, and randomized into two groups, a knee flexion enhanced standardized home exercise program group (group KFEH) and commonly-used supervised physiotherapy group (group SPT). Outcomes were evaluated by observing the joint function with the Knee Society score (KSS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and ROM assessment at selected time points (pre-operation and 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year following post-operation). Results: At last, we observed pain and functional improvements in both groups. Noninferiority was shown 12 months postoperatively for clinical outcomes except group KFEH had better ROM range at 1 month (P<0.01). The absolute value of WOMAC and KSS were slight better in group KFEH without significant difference, and there was no difference about VAS between two groups as well as complication incidence rate. Additionally, home program would save patients’ times and decrease economic burden. Patents would save 14 times postoperative rehabilitation in outhospital service, and cut down at least 782 RMB in total. Conclusion: Taking the rehabilitation and economical efficiency, we recommend knee flexion enhanced home exercise program for TKA rehabilitation management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".