Letters to the Editor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Letters to the Editor Get access Z. I. Sabry, Z. I. Sabry Nutrition Research Consultants Limited P. O. Box 5215 Station A Toronto, Canada M5W IN5 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar J. A. Campbell, J. A. Campbell Nutrition Research Consultants Limited P. O. Box 5215 Station A Toronto, Canada M5W IN5 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar E. Campbell, E. Campbell Nutrition Research Consultants Limited P. O. Box 5215 Station A Toronto, Canada M5W IN5 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar A. L. Forbes, A. L. Forbes Nutrition Research Consultants Limited P. O. Box 5215 Station A Toronto, Canada M5W IN5 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar George G. Graham, M.D. George G. Graham, M.D. Department of International Health School of Hygiene and Public Health JohnHopkins University Baltimore, Maryland 21205 Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Nutrition Reviews, Volume 32, Issue 7, July 1974, Pages 221–223, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1974.tb00969.x Published: 01 July 1974
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".