Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Explores the concept of multiplicity in Deleuze and Guattari’s work and its relevance to artistic practice Provides a series of philosophical encounters with the concept of multiplicity Points to the potentialities circulating in various media for social change Decolonialises our thinking about art by bypassing the mediation of the traditional western-centred art history Contributors include Mieke Bal, James Williams, Laura Marks, Gary Genosko and Eugene Holland This collection of essays from a range of philosophers and art practitioners offers tools through which we can action change across art and philosophy, across a range of media and across the theory/practice divide. Including insights from digital apps to Indigenous ritual art and from feminist and queer art to refugee performances and talismanic magic associated with Islamic Neoplatonism, this collection will decolonise your thinking about art – subverting the traditional Western-centred art history. The first section includes theoretical essays on the concept of multiplicities, on affect and politics as well as the thought of Raymond Ruyer and Gilbert Simondon – 2 key influences on Deleuze and Guattari. The second section includes applied essays on specific art practices including the plastic arts, theatre, architecture, music and folk performances. Notes on Contributors Mieke Bal , cultural theorist, critic, video artist and occasional curator. Burcu Baykan , Bilkent University, Turkey. Gary Genosko , University of Ontario, Institute of Technology in Toronto, Canada. Barbara Glowczewski , National Scientific Research Center, Collège de France, EHESS, France. Eugene W. Holland , Ohio State University, USA. Adi Louria Hayon , Tel Aviv University, Israel. Laura U. Marks , Simon Fraser University, Canada. Radek Przedpełski , Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. Daniela Voss , University of Hildesheim, Germany. James Williams , Deakin University, Australia. S. E. Wilmer , Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland. Audronė Žukauskaitė , Lithuanian Culture Research Institute, Lithuania.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it