MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248273422 · doi:10.1017/9781576473313.007

Extraordinary Performances: the Parisonatina and Others—The Alaska Trip: a Beaver Coat for the Cello

2018· book-chapter· en· W4248273422 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAnimal Law and Welfare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCelloCoatBeaverArtArt historyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From Sitka to Seward, Alaska. Hindemith Cello Concerto. The Debussy Cello Sonata. Playing with Benny Goodman. Parisot and Dave Brubeck. Tailor made: Guarnieri, Powell, Santoro. Cello Through the Centuries. Marriage and Professional Association with Elizabeth Sawyer. Parisot's extraordinary performance of Donald Martino's Parisonatina al'Dodecafonia. On the Parisonatina: “ …there is probably no cellist that can equal Parisot's dazzling achievement. If in thirty years there are a dozen I shall not be surprised, but not now.” Michael Steinberg, Boston Globe “All those fjords—and sometimes there was just enough space for the pilot to go through those two mountains. My heart was going up and going down. I was so scared,” Parisot said of his unique tour of Alaska and nearby locations in Canada. The tour lasted from 17 February to 27 March 1958, and included Kitimat, Prince Rupert, Ketchikan, and many other locations. Parisot traveled to many areas on a small plane that went through the mountains, sometimes up at a steep angle. He had a fur covering and special case for his cello because of the danger that the cello might crack in the extreme cold. The tour was sponsored by the Alaska Music Trail, which had as its mission to bring great music to communities in Alaska. Parisot wrote of his experience in a piece in the Reader's Digest , which was translated into several languages. He got many concerts from this publicity. The piece was titled, “A Matter of Communication,” and in it he spoke of the importance of performing in small towns as well as in large communities, and of the importance of knowing audience reaction to his performance. This is something he lived as a performing artist and also wants to pass on to his students–something that defines him as a performing artist. Parisot was welcomed by the local fishermen, who invited him to their homes and made him dinner. “Going up, I never paid a dinner or lunch. I remember King Crab—it was one leg for twenty people.” He described the warmth of the people—and the cold outside. My Alaskan tour was fascinating, if cold. I played in all sorts of towns and cities and in all sorts of weather. One town was so small that the whole population, including the police department, came to the concert.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnimal Law and WelfareFrench-language works237,207