MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248278639 · doi:10.1139/w01-059

Bacteriophage T4 multiplication in a glucose-limited <i>Escherichia coli</i> biofilm

2001· article· en· W4248278639 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brian D. Corbin, Robert McLean, Gary M. Aron

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTexas State University
KeywordsBiofilmBacteriophageMicrobiologyTiterEscherichia coliBiologyMultiplicity of infectionBacteriaChemostatVirologyVirusBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An Escherichia coli K-12 biofilm was grown at a dilution rate of 0.028 h -1 for 48 h in a glucose-limited chemostat coupled to a modified Robbins' device to determine its susceptibility to infection by bacteriophage T4. Bacteriophage T4 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 caused a log reduction in biofilm density (expressed as colony forming units (CFU) per cm 2 ) at 90 min postinfection. After 6 h, a net decrease and equilibrium in viral titer was seen. When biofilms were exposed to T4 phage at a MOI of 100, viral titer doubled after 90 min. After 6 h, viral titers (expressed as plaque forming units (PFU) per cm 2 ) stabilized at levels approximately one order of magnitude higher than seen at a MOI of 10. Scanning confocal laser microscopy images also indicated disruption of biofilm morphology following T4 infection with the effects being more pronounced at a MOI of 100 than at a MOI of 10. These results imply that biofilms under carbon limitation can act as natural reservoirs for bacteriophage and that bacteriophage can have some influence on biofilm morphology.Key words: bacteriophage T4, biofilm, biofilm morphology, bacteriophage ecology, carbon limitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207