Bacteriophage T4 multiplication in a glucose-limited <i>Escherichia coli</i> biofilm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An Escherichia coli K-12 biofilm was grown at a dilution rate of 0.028 h-1 for 48 h in a glucose-limited chemostat coupled to a modified Robbins' device to determine its susceptibility to infection by bacteriophage T4. Bacteriophage T4 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 caused a log reduction in biofilm density (expressed as colony forming units (CFU) per cm2) at 90 min postinfection. After 6 h, a net decrease and equilibrium in viral titer was seen. When biofilms were exposed to T4 phage at a MOI of 100, viral titer doubled after 90 min. After 6 h, viral titers (expressed as plaque forming units (PFU) per cm2) stabilized at levels approximately one order of magnitude higher than seen at a MOI of 10. Scanning confocal laser microscopy images also indicated disruption of biofilm morphology following T4 infection with the effects being more pronounced at a MOI of 100 than at a MOI of 10. These results imply that biofilms under carbon limitation can act as natural reservoirs for bacteriophage and that bacteriophage can have some influence on biofilm morphology.Key words: bacteriophage T4, biofilm, biofilm morphology, bacteriophage ecology, carbon limitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".