Bibliographic record
Abstract
Other| February 01, 2005 New Mineral Names* John L. Jambor; John L. Jambor † 1Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada †E-mail: JLJambor@aol.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Edward S. Grew; Edward S. Grew 2Department of Geology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 0446-5711, U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Andrew C. Roberts Andrew C. Roberts 2Department of Geology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 0446-5711, U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information John L. Jambor † 1Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada Edward S. Grew 2Department of Geology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 0446-5711, U.S.A. Andrew C. Roberts 2Department of Geology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 0446-5711, U.S.A. †E-mail: JLJambor@aol.com Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1945-3027 Print ISSN: 0003-004X © 2005 American Mineralogist American Mineralogist (2005) 90 (2-3): 518–522. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.430 Article history First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation John L. Jambor, Edward S. Grew, Andrew C. Roberts; New Mineral Names. American Mineralogist 2005;; 90 (2-3): 518–522. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.430 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyAmerican Mineralogist Search Advanced Search A.C. Roberts, J.A.R. Stirling, A.J. Criddle, G.E. Dunning, J. Spratt (2004) Aurivilliusite, Hg2+Hg1+OI, a new mineral species from the Clear Creek claim, San Benito County, California, USA. Mineral. Mag., 68, 241–245. Electron microprobe analysis gave HgO 40.10, Hg2O 38.62, I 22.76, Br 0.22, Cl 0.06, O ≡ I,Br,Cl 1.46, sum 100.30 wt%, corresponding to Hg2+1.00Hg1+1.00O1.01(I0.97Br0.01Cl0.01)∑0.99 for O +I + Br + Cl = 2 and with Hg2+ and Hg1+ partitioned in accordance with the synthetic analog. The... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".