Glenn Gould, Arnold Schoenberg, and Soviet Reception of the Second Viennese School
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gould and Schoenberg The year 2007 marked not only the seventy-fifth anniversary of Glenn Gould's birth and the twenty-fifth anniversary of his all-too-early death, but also the fiftieth anniversary of his historic concerts and lecture-recitals in Moscow and Leningrad. In this essay, I will reflect on the extraordinary impact Gould's Russian tour had on the appetite for musical modernism in the Soviet Union, in the middle of the Cold War, at a time when Soviet culture was beginning to emerge from the brutal artistic repressions of the Stalin years. Gould was a passionate advocate for the music of Arnold Schoenberg. Lawrence Schoenberg has noted that “Canada has always been friendly to Arnold Schoenberg.” At mid-century, while most of Schoenberg's Canadian apostles were Austro-German expatriates—Otto Joachim, Lothar Klein, Alfred Rosé, Karl Steiner, and Gould's friend Franz Kraemer, for example–Gould was the most passionate among a new generation of home-grown Canadian Schoenbergians. He truly loved this important but difficult music, and he admired the rigour and rationality underlying its construction. Gould described Schoenberg as “a colossus of biblical proportions,” and considered twelve-tone technique the only truly valid innovation in twentieth-century musical language. Seeking a rapprochement between hostile audiences and the music of their time, Gould performed and recorded Schoenberg's music more than any other musician of his stature. Schoenberg fascinated him—as did Gibbons, Sweelinck, and Richard Strauss—because he was “one of the crucial pivot composers in music history.” Like Schoenberg, Gould had an interest in music that was stripped of adornment. He felt that one of Schoenberg's achievements was to have effectively simplified compositional language after the chromatic excesses of the late nineteenth century, much as the composers of the late Renaissance had done with the modal music of their time. Like Schoenberg, Gould felt that music must always point to something mystical, beyond itself; it must always aspire to a higher truth and integrity. His prodigious technique notwithstanding, Gould was therefore strongly opposed to all forms of musical showmanship for its own sake.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".