MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248575849 · doi:10.1017/9781576472828.016

Glenn Gould, Arnold Schoenberg, and Soviet Reception of the Second Viennese School

2018· book-chapter· en· W4248575849 on OpenAlexaff
James D. Wright

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoviet unionModernism (music)Cold warMusicalIvanovichArt historyAncient historyHistoryArtClassicsLiteratureLawPolitical scienceSociologyRussian federationPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gould and Schoenberg The year 2007 marked not only the seventy-fifth anniversary of Glenn Gould's birth and the twenty-fifth anniversary of his all-too-early death, but also the fiftieth anniversary of his historic concerts and lecture-recitals in Moscow and Leningrad. In this essay, I will reflect on the extraordinary impact Gould's Russian tour had on the appetite for musical modernism in the Soviet Union, in the middle of the Cold War, at a time when Soviet culture was beginning to emerge from the brutal artistic repressions of the Stalin years. Gould was a passionate advocate for the music of Arnold Schoenberg. Lawrence Schoenberg has noted that “Canada has always been friendly to Arnold Schoenberg.” At mid-century, while most of Schoenberg's Canadian apostles were Austro-German expatriates—Otto Joachim, Lothar Klein, Alfred Rosé, Karl Steiner, and Gould's friend Franz Kraemer, for example–Gould was the most passionate among a new generation of home-grown Canadian Schoenbergians. He truly loved this important but difficult music, and he admired the rigour and rationality underlying its construction. Gould described Schoenberg as “a colossus of biblical proportions,” and considered twelve-tone technique the only truly valid innovation in twentieth-century musical language. Seeking a rapprochement between hostile audiences and the music of their time, Gould performed and recorded Schoenberg's music more than any other musician of his stature. Schoenberg fascinated him—as did Gibbons, Sweelinck, and Richard Strauss—because he was “one of the crucial pivot composers in music history.” Like Schoenberg, Gould had an interest in music that was stripped of adornment. He felt that one of Schoenberg's achievements was to have effectively simplified compositional language after the chromatic excesses of the late nineteenth century, much as the composers of the late Renaissance had done with the modal music of their time. Like Schoenberg, Gould felt that music must always point to something mystical, beyond itself; it must always aspire to a higher truth and integrity. His prodigious technique notwithstanding, Gould was therefore strongly opposed to all forms of musical showmanship for its own sake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207