Barère, penseur et acteur d'un premier opportunisme républicain face au Directoire exécutif
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pierre Serna, Barère, a Proponent of a New Brand of Republican Opportunism vis-à-vis the Directoire Exécutif In Year V, shortly before the Germinal elections, Barère while in hiding published his reflections on government and the modus operandi of the Directoire. For one who had been a member of the Committee of Public Safety at the height of the Terror, building a republic required a strong form of government, with a powerful executive arm. This was a constant concern of the Pyrenean deputy who in 1815 was again a member of the House during the Hundred Days and reiterated the need for a clear definition of executive power. This very constancy transcends the debate over the supposed or real chameleon-like behaviour of Barère and reveals a new brand of republican opportunism. The intangible republican was in favour of a republican « golden mean », characterized by a strong and structured executive apparatus, in sharp contrast with a generation of politicians forever wary of the executive. By opting for a republic of the centre, Barère showed he belonged to a current of opinion which, from the summer of 1791 to the autumn of 1799, legitimized the brutal use of the prerogatives of executive power in the promotion and defence of the constitution or the republic. These men, who had followed different roads and were finally united by Bonaparte, were the inventors of what I choose to call the republic of the « extreme centre ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".