Ketahanan Ekonomi Rumah Tangga Pertanian di Wilayah Terkena Erupsi Merapi 2010 Melalui Indeks Standar Hidup yang Disesuaikan (Studi Kasus Tahun 2012)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gunung Merapi merupakan kawasan strategis pertanian. Namun erupsi pada 26 Oktober 2010 telah memberikan pengaruh negatif terhadap perekonomian petani setempat. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini akan mengkaji standar hidup praerupsi, evaluasi capaian pemulihan/ketahanan ekonomi, perbandingan capaian pemulihan/ketahanan ekonomi, serta identifikasi dimensi pembeda capaian pemulihan/ketahanan ekonomi pada rumah tangga pertanian terkena erupsi. Berdasarkan pendekatan standar hidup dengan Indeks Standar Hidup yang Disesuaikan (ISHD) serta dengan analisis uji t satu populasi, uji t populasi berpasangan, dan analisis varians (ANOVA), diketahui bahwa rumah tangga pertanian di wilayah terkena erupsi Merapi 2010 memiliki standar hidup yang rendah pada saat praerupsi. Namun demikian, rumah tangga tersebut justru memiliki ketahanan ekonomi ketika menghadapi shock bencana erupsi. Selain itu, perbandingan antar kabupaten menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan ketahanan ekonomi rumah tangga yang diakibatkan oleh perbedaan capaian dimensi bantuan sosial. Namun berdasarkan dimensi pendapatan, aset non-usaha dan aset usaha menunjukkan bahwa ketahanan ekonomi rumah tangga pertanian relatif sama antar kabupaten.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".