Faculty Opinions recommendation of Rhinovirus has the unique ability to directly activate human T cells in vitro.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rhinovirus infection is a leading cause of exacerbation of airway diseases. We hypothesize that airway viruses activate inflammatory cells, inducing airway dysfunction. We have previously shown that airway viruses can induce eosinophil degranulation when cocultured with T cells and monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs). These findings suggested that antigen presentation was important for T-cell activation.OBJECTIVE: Given the clinical importance of rhinovirus, we sought to determine whether it had any unique abilities to activate inflammatory cells compared with another common virus, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).METHODS: We cocultured combinations of human leukocytes (T cells, moDCs, and eosinophils) with each virus. Using assays of BrdU incorporation, flow cytometry, and ELISA, we measured T-cell activation, rhinovirus expression, T-cell death, and eosinophil cysteinyl leukotriene release.RESULTS: In contrast to RSV, rhinovirus induced T-cell activation without the involvement of moDCs. Without moDCs, rhinovirus induced T-cell proliferation of both CD4 and CD8(+) cells, cytokine production, and ultimately, eosinophil stimulation. Although chloroquine inhibited RSV-induced activation of T cells through moDCs, rhinovirus was not inhibited; UV inactivation did block the rhinovirus effect. We also found that T cells could be infected by rhinovirus in vitro and within human nasal explant tissue. Although Toll-like receptors did not appear to be involved in T-cell activation, antagonists of Jun N-terminal kinase and nuclear factor κB did inhibit T-cell responses to rhinovirus.CONCLUSION: Rhinovirus has the unique ability to bypass antigen presentation and directly infect and activate human T cells. This could explain the strong association of rhinovirus with exacerbation of airway diseases.Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. PMID: 23374267 Funding information This work was supported by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.476 | 0.310 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".