MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248876598 · doi:10.1109/i2mtc.2018.8409516

Technical papers table of contents

2018· article· en· W4248876598 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Sensor Networks for Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWestern Sydney UniversityUniversidade Federal da ParaíbaUniversità degli Studi della Campania Luigi VanvitelliIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca MetrologicaNational Taipei University of TechnologyOulun YliopistoUniversità di BolognaUniversity of BalamandTallinna TehnikaülikoolSouth China University of TechnologyUniversità degli Studi di PalermoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulZhejiang UniversityTianjin UniversityÚstav termomechaniky, Akademie Věd České RepublikyUniversità degli Studi di TrentoUniversity of South CarolinaIndian Institute of Technology MadrasUniversità di PisaHarbin Institute of TechnologyEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichUniversity of Western SydneyUniversitatea Politehnica TimisoaraChulalongkorn UniversityTU Graz, Internationale Beziehungen und MobilitätsprogrammeDurham UniversityUniversità degli Studi di MessinaUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheSveučilište u ZagrebuNewcastle UniversityBeijing Jiaotong UniversityCERNMcMaster UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of OklahomaUniversità di CataniaMissouri University of Science and TechnologyTechnische Universität ChemnitzUniversität RostockTsinghua UniversityUniversità degli Studi di BresciaPolitecnico di TorinoState Key Laboratory of Industrial Control TechnologyUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterSeconda Università degli Studi di NapoliUniversità degli Studi di Cagliari
KeywordsComputer scienceTable (database)Table of contentsInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following topics are dealt with: condition monitoring; calibration; vibrations; feature extraction; learning (artificial intelligence); fault diagnosis; fibre optic sensors; patient monitoring; temperature measurement; medical signal processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it