MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4248904831 · doi:10.33017/reveciperu2020.0010/

Diseño y construcción de un sistema automatizado de control de bombas deagua en un cultivo hidropónico en el entorno Arduino, UNSCH – Ayacucho

2020· article· en· W4248904831 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Luis Huayanay Villar, J. Oré, Sheyla Yassira, Meneses Hiyo

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista ECIPeru · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKnowledge Societies in the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArduinoGreenhouseIrrigationHumanitiesEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceOperating systemHorticultureArtBiologyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of the work to develop an automated irrigation system about Arduino for hydroponic crops The system uses an Arduino ATmega328P board to connect different components, such as a real-time clock module, LCD I2c screen, two one-channel relay modules and electrical resistors; For the purpose to obtain a micro programmable controller that turns on and off the water pump of a greenhouse in times determined according to the development of the crop, particularly in lettuce crops with different varieties .For this, it’s necessary to use different control techniques and to carry out several experimental tests in order to adjust certain control parameters, especially humidity and temperature. This system was installed in the greenhouse of the Community of Mollepata in Ayacucho, within the three-year agreement "Inti, the energy that feeds the Earth" between the National University of San Cristóbal de Huamanga (UNSCH) and the Regional Committee of Education for Development Lanaudière International (CREDIL – JOLIETTE) - Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista ECIPeruSame topicKnowledge Societies in the 21st CenturyFrench-language works237,207